Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Medical Science ; 26(122):12, 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1887479

ABSTRACT

Background: Despite the emergence of potentially prophylactic vaccines, COVID-19 transmission poses a persistent threat to healthcare providers (HCPs) communities. Aim: Assess the progress in the knowledge and attitudes of HCPs of Armed Forces Hospital Wadi Al Dawasir (AFHWD) toward COVID-19 measures and vaccines perception. Methods: A questionnaire was distributed online, 09-10, 2021, to achieve study aim. SPSS-22.0 software was used for the analysis;ANOVA;t-test used for comparing quantitative variables;.2 for categorical data;level of materiality set to 0.05. Results: Out of 149 HCPs, 38 (25.5%) were "physician" 44 (29.5%);"nurse";31 (20.8%) " allied health" 11 (7.4%)" pharmacist";25 (16.8%);"other"'. HCPs averaged 39.3 +/- 9.2y of age. Overall score (84.3%) greater than cutoff, set to 70%, also greater than that assessed earlier (69.5%) was achieved (p=0.005). The higher profession the higher score (p<0.05). "Age";"clinician";"infection prevention and control (IPC) training;"COVID-19 infection", were significant score predictors. COVID-19 "all knowledge" (general and IPC, combined) = 79% exceeded cutoff (70%), (p<0.001);also exceeded that identified earlier (69.6%), (p<0.001). The IPC perception score behaved likewise: 86.1% vs. 70%, 86.1% vs. 71.6%, (p<0.001), respectively. An overall vaccine response (68.3%) comparable to cutoff was verified (68.3%), (p=0.08). Most (86.6%) HCPs accepted a COVID-19 vaccine;73.2% were vaccine confident;23.3% of those immunized were concomitantly vaccine hesitant (p = 0.012). "Age" and "clinician" predicted vaccine response variability. Conclusion: Findings imply an ongoing improvement of the HCPs' responses on COVID-19 requirements. Continued education and adherence with updated protocols provide utmost protective environment for the HCP staff against COVID-19 consequences.

2.
Medical Science ; 26(121):11, 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1812222

ABSTRACT

Background: COVID-19 still poses a threat to healthcare workers (HCW). Aim: Study knowledge and attitude of the HCWs of King Abdulaziz Specialist Hospital (KASH), Taif, Saudi Arabia, about COVID-19 and the vaccine rollout. Methods: A questionnaire was self-administered to achieve study aim. Results: The participants aged 39.3 +/- 3.9;41.5% were physicians, 58.5% non-physicians. A questionnaire's mean overall score [93.5 (62.3%)]<cutoff [105 (70.0%);p<0.001] was recorded;"physician" was predictor for score variability (p<0.001). A mean "COVID-19 epidemiological/clinical knowledge" score [22.2/32 (69.4%)] comparable to the cutoff [22.4/32 (70%), p=0.64];and that [21.7/38 (57.1%)] for "COVID-19 infection prevention/ control (IPC) guidelines" <cutoff [26.6/38 (70%), p<0.001] were recorded. Perception [21.3/28 (76.0%)] of the latter exceeded the cutoff [19.5/28 (70%), p<0.001]. Despite a modest vaccine response, 86.5% HCWs were vaccinated candidates. Being a physician, male, had COVID-19 infection were vaccination predictors. Conclusion: A satisfactory COVID-19 knowledge and a favorable IPC attitude;with a modest vaccine response yet a notable vaccination acceptance were reported. Supplementing our HCWs' adequate COVID-19 control practice, e.g., through holistic COVID-19 training until enough evidence for vaccine safety has been established is warranted.

3.
Medical Science ; 25(107):36-45, 2021.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1126058

ABSTRACT

Aim: Study knowledge and perception of COVID-19 prevention and control (IPC) measures of healthcare workers (HCWs) of Armed Forced Hospital, Wadi Al Dawasir (AFHWD), Saudi Arabia. Methods: All HCWs were invited June, 2020;a pre-validated questionnaire used. Results: Out of 103 participants, 40 (38.9%) were physicians, 33 (32.0%) nurses, 30 (29.1%) other HCWs;mean age 39.4 +/- 9.5y. The mean score for COVID-19 knowledge surpassed the cutoff (25.1 vs. 22.4, p<0.001);contrary to COVID-19 IPC measures' (33.4 vs. 36.4;p=0.01). COVID-19 "all-knowledge" mean score (58.5) equated the cutoff (58.8) (p=0.89);same as IPC measures perception mean score's (80.8 vs. 81.2, p = 0.8). An overall mean score (139.5) achieved equated the cutoff (140), (p = 0.83). Physicians and nurses achieved mean COVID-19 IPC knowledge scores (35.8, 34.9) higher than other professions' (p<0.001). Physicians referred to reliable COVID-19 sources more frequently (aOR 4.1, 95%CI 2.1 - 11.7). Conclusion: The HCW levels of knowledge and perception toward COVID-19 measures were satisfactory. Awareness of some specific COVID-19 IPC measures needs to be enhanced. Findings help update COVID-19 preventive policy;raising the HCWs' COVID-19 nosocomial transmission preventive skills.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL